February 19, 2025
The Government faces many challenges, from enhancing European security to advancing AI and manufacturing. A crucial aspect of this is effectively communicating its environmental goals.
Concerned by official figures showing the economy struggling in the wake of the October Budget, ministers have intensified their focus on growth, particularly through technology and AI.
Meanwhile, amid growing dominance of China as the world’s manufacturer and President Trump’s talk of trade tariffs, people are asking, why doesn’t Britain make things anymore? The Cambridge don Tim Minshall has published a book about it.
AI’s data use is set to send demand for power soaring. And manufacturing relies on the ready availability of affordable energy. Yet due to self-imposed strictures, Britain has among the highest energy costs in the west.
A point made by Professor Minshall on Today (2:45min in) is that Britain is a global hotbed of creativity and innovation, and could use the ideas emanating from its campuses and research institutions to rediscover the country’s historic manufacturing mojo.
This applies to particularly to energy. British firms are pioneering low-carbon solutions across the board and the Government should do all in its power to encourage them, by creating the conditions for private investment to thrive.
The overwhelming scientific consensus is clear on the need drastically to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to combat climate change, and lowering emissions must remain a key objective of UK policy. Yet net zero by 2050 looks harder by the day.
Tomiwa Owolade wrote: “The evidence is that voters are fed up with being told what to think in order to qualify as a good person, rather than being offered arguments to consider on their own merits.” The Times columnist was talking about ‘woke causes’, but his words apply equally to net zero.
There is a contradiction in asking people to abandon the development of abundant domestic gas—much more environmentally friendly than oil and coal—while resorting to imports from nations that may not meet the same environmental or human rights standards, often at a higher cost and similar or greater emissions levels.
There’s no point constraining industry to the point where there’s no revenue and taxation to fund the energy transition. And how do we produce plastics and chemicals without oil or gas?
It’s time for ministers to change the narrative, emphasising the prospects of addressing climate change, alongside protecting jobs and manufacturing, and maintaining a vibrant economy.